We’ve all witnessed controversial fashion moments in our own lives.
Will anyone ever learn?
Probably off the rack, but certainly not a steal, the outfit cost $1960according toYahoo Style.
Many users took to Twitter to express their disgust for the first daughter’s hemline.
How can you wear a pink skirt so SHORT?
You’re a conservative woman in a conservative country!!!"
When the issue hit the newsstands in December 2015, disability advocates were outraged.
However,Interviewgave a statement toPeople, defending the cover as art.
She continued, “Not to mention the fake turquoise/Navajo/southwest jewelry with a plains headdress.”
“We are sorry that the Native American headdress replica used in our recent fashion show has upset individuals.
We sincerely apologize, as we absolutely had no intention to offend anyone.
Biggie’s mother Voletta Wallactook to Instagramto express her outrage.
“I am not sure who told@kyliejennerand@kendalljennerthat they had the right to do this.
This is disrespectful, disgusting, and exploitation at its worst!!!”
The tee shirts have been pulled from retail and all images have been removed.
Not surprisingly, Villa wasn’t bothered by negative reactions.
She told her haters to back off in anInstagram post.
“Go big, or go home,” she said.
Above all make a choice for tolerance and love.
See the person over the politics, carry yourself with dignity, always.
Life is made to be lived, so go boldly and give no effs!
TheWashington Postreported that the dress was designed by Filipino-born American designer, Andre Soriano.
We need to move this country forward, and we believe it’s time to promote love.
We only live once, and we need to promote love.
We have one president now who is going to do the best thing for planet America.”
But the dress wasn’t just a wardrobe choice it was intended as a protest against the U.S. government.
But Gaga’s intention was a little different than many people assumed.
“It’s certainly no disrespect to anyone that’s vegan or vegetarian.
As you know, I’m the most judgment-free human being on the Earth.
Sharon Stone wears a Gap turtleneck to the Oscars
The ’90s were a different time.
Instagram didn’t exist and celebrities didn’t need to employ stylists for every photo op.
Once again, Stone looked like million bucks even if her outfit didn’t cost that much.
The stereotypes they depict are more than a century old.
You’re seeing laundry service.
You’re seeing basically an entire religion and philosophy being trivialized.”
Abercrombie spokesperson Hampton Carney responded to the publication saying, “We personally thought Asians would love this T-shirt.
We are truly and deeply sorry we’ve offended people.”
But the apology was thinly veiled.
Carney continued, “We never single out any one group to poke fun at.
There’s really no group we haven’t teased.”
CBS was initially fined $550,000 by the Federal Communication Commission for the slip.
However, theSupreme Courttossed out this ruling in 2012.
Both Jackson and Timberlake denied the incident was intentional.
MTV [who produced the show] was completely unaware of it.
It was not my intention that it go as far as it did.
I apologize to anyone offended including the audience, MTV, CBS and the N.F.L."
But not everyone was upset.
Shot by famed photographer Annie Leibovitz, CyrustoldPeopleshe wasn’t happy with the end result.
“My goal in my music and my acting is always to make people happy.
ForVanity Fair, I was so honored and thrilled to work with Annie [Leibovitz].
She added, “The pictures of me on the Internet were silly, inappropriate shots.
Cyrus was starring on The Disney Channel’sHannah Montanaat the time.
Needles to say, their executives weren’t exactly thrilled and gave their own statement toPeople.
The T-shirt depicted blood splattered over Yankee-colored lettering.
When word got out, the shirts were immediately recalled.
But in a strange turn of events, the shirts quickly became a collector’s item.
According to theHuffington Post, the shirts were selling for as much as $150,000 on eBay.
She’ll love this tee that’s just as cute and sassy as she is.”
It garnered a total of 1,620 signatures.
The company responded by issuing a statement.
“Our merchandise is intended to appeal to a broad customer base, not to offend them.
While she didn’t find what she was looking for, she found an egregious mistake by the company.
AccordingtoCNN, many people took to Twitter to express their disgust.
It is unacceptable, and we apologize.
We worked quickly to remove this.
In 2014, she was spotted wearing it throughout her tour of Australia and New Zealand.
Perhaps she donated the money she was going to spend on something new.
Then again, who really cares if you wear the same outfit more than once?
